A Pro-Life Friend

13 notes

Interesting how liberals get all up in arms when a woman dies unnecessarily and tragically overseas at the hands of Catholic law but could care less about someone in the states dieing because of a botched abortion at the hands of Planned Pa
renthood… Not a word from them… Planned Parenthood let this girl hemorrhage for hours without calling 911… What about Tonya Reaves? Why didn’t you pitch a fit about her? Why haven’t they been talking about this? Because they worship Planned Parenthood. Their religion is always right… especially when they let women bleed to death. No liberal would ever question Planned Parenthood… NEVER! We’ve heard NOTHING from them ! They don’t care about women. They care about abortion! They want abortion. Think clearly my friends, think clearly.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/14/world/europe/ireland-abortion-controversy/index.html

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/08/27/mother-of-woman-who-died-after-abortion-sues-planned-parenthood-hospital/


http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/08/27/mother-of-woman-who-died-after-abortion-sues-planned-parenthood-hospital/

Filed under liberal PlannedParenthood abortion Ireland prolife prochoice

1 note

mariillustriousmakinami asked: I appreciate your sympathy to the victims (which seems to be uncommon), but I have to point out the major flaw in your argument: math is proven, solid, and can't be bent or changed to fit one's ideology. It isn't imposed on others socially and by law, unlike religion. I see what you meant, however: "God's followers can be bad but God isn't". The only problem with that is that deities are entirely the idea of man-the followers ARE the god. I would explain further, but your ask won't allow it.

Do you think that a philosophy should be judged by its abuse?

Filed under God philosophy Christian

1 note

Anonymous asked: Those ethicists were merely speculating about hypothetical moralities (even if they weren't, no one will actually take them seriously), and no government would actually allow children to be killed. If you are so far down the rabbit hole that you could believe infanticide is the next logical step after abortion then I've got a bridge to sell you.

have you ever heard of Peter Singer? Professor at Princeton… teaching infanticide… Youtube him. Be informed.

0 notes

Anonymous asked: Hello! This is a question about your thoughts on homosexuality/same-sex marriage (just curious). I know that to you marriage is a religious thing, and that's totally fine! But can't it also be a secular thing to some people? If you don't believe homosexuality is right, why don't you just make that your own personal decision, instead of putting your religious thoughts onto others? Isn't barring people from marrying someone they love because of your religion religious oppression, and not freedom?

Marriage is very secular. Its a human thing. Marriage has been around since the beginning of time, whether people were religious or not. It’s about definitions. Marriage is between a man and a woman… Thats the definition and to allow a union between two people of the same gender doesn’t make it marriage. You can’t change the definition of something. Two men can’t marry, that’s not marriage.

It’s about freedom or oppression. Its about the truth.

4 notes

For at least a decade, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, the worlds leading breast cancer organization, had been dealing with the backlash from pro-life conservatives because of its grants to Planned Parenthood, the worlds largest abortion provider. According to Karen Handel, Komens Senior Vice President of Public Policy in 2011, the two organizations had mutually agreed to part ways amicably, but then Planned Parenthood surprisingly unleaded a media attack against Komen, waiving the banner of women’s health as a shield for its underlying political agenda. Public criticism against Komen intensified with damaging consequences, eventually concluding in Komens surrender and Karens resignation. 
In daring to walk away, Komen had unwittingly ignited a battle in which became collateral damage in a larger election year war between liberals and conservatives for the souls and votes of women and the nations conscience- with abortion and contraception linked as ultimate wedge issues. 
What exactly went on inside the firestorm of controversy? Were there larger forces at play? In this tell-all, highly charge account, Karen Handle breaks the silence and finally reveals what really happened in the winter of 2011.

For at least a decade, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, the worlds leading breast cancer organization, had been dealing with the backlash from pro-life conservatives because of its grants to Planned Parenthood, the worlds largest abortion provider. According to Karen Handel, Komens Senior Vice President of Public Policy in 2011, the two organizations had mutually agreed to part ways amicably, but then Planned Parenthood surprisingly unleaded a media attack against Komen, waiving the banner of women’s health as a shield for its underlying political agenda. Public criticism against Komen intensified with damaging consequences, eventually concluding in Komens surrender and Karens resignation.
In daring to walk away, Komen had unwittingly ignited a battle in which became collateral damage in a larger election year war between liberals and conservatives for the souls and votes of women and the nations conscience- with abortion and contraception linked as ultimate wedge issues.
What exactly went on inside the firestorm of controversy? Were there larger forces at play? In this tell-all, highly charge account, Karen Handle breaks the silence and finally reveals what really happened in the winter of 2011.

0 notes

Buy this book and read it. I keep havin to buy it because I keep giving it away. I feel that strongly about this book. “[It] change how you see the world.” -Mike Huckabee #indivisible # (Taken with Instagram)

Buy this book and read it. I keep havin to buy it because I keep giving it away. I feel that strongly about this book. “[It] change how you see the world.” -Mike Huckabee #indivisible # (Taken with Instagram)

Filed under indivisible